Loading prices …
inotoken

Calculator · 3 min

How risky is your mix?

Push the five sliders to the split that interests you. You get a ring chart straight away, the euro amounts per class, a risk score from 1 to 10 and an answer to the uncomfortable question: what would a year like 2022 have done to this mix?

Set your mix

The five sliders are always converted to 100 %. Pull one up and the shares of the others fall.

0 %100 %
0 %100 %
0 %100 %

This means coins in the top 20 places by market capitalisation, leaving out bitcoin and ethereum.

0 %100 %
0 %100 %

Total 100 %.

Examples to try, not a recommendation for any split.

Risk score of this mix
5.6 of 10
balanced
50 %Largest position: Bitcoin
3Classes above a 5 % share
5 %Stablecoin share
Looking back at a year like 2022

The risk score is a measure of this tool, not a figure from any rulebook. The 2022 losses are documented for bitcoin and ethereum; for the other three classes they are assumptions. What comes from where is set out below.

Note: The mixer replays one scenario from your own entries. It is not investment advice and not a recommendation for any split, and the loss figures for 2022 are in part assumptions.

How the tool calculates

The mixer first turns five slider positions into shares. It adds the five values and divides each one by that total, so the result always comes to exactly 100 %. That is why the other shares fall as soon as you pull one slider up. The euro figures per class come from those shares and your total amount.

The risk score is a weighted mean. Each class carries a fixed number between 1 and 10, and the shares are the weights. Bitcoin sits at 5, ethereum at 6, large altcoins at 7, small altcoins at 9 and stablecoins at 1. These five numbers are a measure set by this tool and not a figure from any rulebook. They reflect the fact that smaller coins usually have thinner order books, shorter histories and wider swings. The resulting value is then described by its number: up to 3 defensive, up to 6 balanced, up to 8 growth-oriented, above that speculative. Those are descriptions of the mix, not recommendations.

The look back at 2022 and what in it is an assumption

2022 works as a test year because the whole market took two heavy shocks within twelve months. The Bank for International Settlements puts the loss of value in the crypto market in 2022 at more than 1.8 trillion US dollars. Of that, around 450 billion US dollars disappeared around the collapse of TerraUSD in May 2022 and a further 200 billion US dollars in the course of the FTX insolvency in November 2022. For bitcoin and ether the same source gives a price fall of around 75 % over the year. The European Securities and Markets Authority puts the market fall for the first half of 2022 at more than 60 %.

ClassRisk scoreLoss in 2022Where the figure comes from
Bitcoin575 %documented: around 75 % over the course of 2022
Ethereum675 %documented: the same source names ether together with bitcoin
Large altcoins780 %an assumption of this tool, somewhat steeper than bitcoin
Small altcoins990 %an assumption of this tool, clearly steeper
Stablecoins10 %an assumption: the peg to the US dollar holds all year
The first two rows are documented, the other three are expressly assumptions of this tool. The risk score is a measure set by this tool in all five rows.
Note: The assumption of 0 % for stablecoins describes the normal case, not the worst case. Before its collapse TerraUSD had a market capitalisation of around 16 billion euro and lost almost all of it on 9 May 2022. The European Central Bank records that stablecoins are anything but stable: even a large, collateralised coin lost its peg to the dollar for a time. Anyone holding stablecoins carries the risk of the issuer and of its reserves.

What spreading within crypto can achieve

Spreading only works if the parts move differently. Within the crypto market that is weakly developed. The European Securities and Markets Authority describes the position in its analysis of crypto-assets and financial stability by saying, in short, that practically everything correlates with bitcoin; at the same time it found a fairly stable positive correlation with the equity market and especially with technology stocks. The European Central Bank reaches the same conclusion in its financial stability review and therefore doubts the value of crypto-assets for spreading a portfolio. In practice that means ten different coins in a portfolio are not ten different risks, but mostly the same risk ten times over at different strengths. Anyone who wants to see this in the mixer can push the sliders back and forth: between a portfolio of bitcoin alone and one of small altcoins alone there are exactly 15 percentage points in the look back at 2022, 75 % against 90 %, while the stablecoin share on its own moves the figure noticeably.

Market capitalisation, that is price times circulating supply, is the usual measure of size behind the split into large and small altcoins. It says something about tradability and attention, but nothing about quality. For scale: the securities authority put the whole crypto market in July 2022 at around 0.9 trillion euro, against around 124 trillion euro of equities and around 127 trillion euro of bonds worldwide.

Where the mixer stops

The mixer replays a single scenario, and it does so backwards. It says nothing about the future, it knows no prices from today, and it takes account of neither fees nor taxes nor the timing of your purchases. Anyone buying across the year would have had a different path through 2022 than someone who bought everything at once in January. The split into five classes is rough as well: within small altcoins there are worlds between a project with real users and a coin with nothing behind it, and one slider does not show that. And the risk score measures price risk only. The risk of losing access to your own keys, or of falling for a fraud, sits in none of these numbers.

Frequently asked questions

Why does the total always jump to 100 per cent?

Because a mix only makes sense as a ratio. The tool adds the five slider values and divides each by that total. Two sliders at 50 therefore give the same picture as two sliders at 100. What counts is the distance between the sliders, not how high they stand.

Is the risk score from 1 to 10 an official figure?

No. The five class values are a measure set by this tool so that mixes can be compared at all. They come from no statute and from no supervisory rulebook. Anyone who thinks other numbers are right will get a different result.

Why do bitcoin and ethereum lose the same amount in the look back?

Because the source quoted names both together and gives a fall of around 75 per cent for 2022. That is precisely the point: the large coins fell roughly equally hard in 2022. Splitting between bitcoin and ethereum would have achieved almost nothing that year.

Are stablecoins the safe part of the mix?

They barely move in the normal case, which does not make them safe. TerraUSD lost almost its entire market capitalisation within a few days in May 2022, and even a large collateralised coin came off the dollar for a time. Anyone holding stablecoins carries the risk of the issuer and of its reserves.

Are my entries saved?

The slider positions and the amount sit in the local storage of your browser, so the mix is still there on your next visit. None of it is transmitted or analysed. Clear the browser data for this site and the mixer goes back to its starting values.

Sources

  1. Crypto shocks and retail losses (BIS Bulletin no. 69, 20 February 2023)Bank for International Settlements, bulletin of 20 February 2023
  2. Crypto-assets and their risks for financial stability (TRV Risk Analysis, October 2022)European Securities and Markets Authority, risk analysis of October 2022
  3. Stablecoins' role in crypto and beyond: functions, risks and policy (Macroprudential Bulletin, July 2022)European Central Bank, macroprudential bulletin of July 2022
  4. Decrypting financial stability risks in crypto-asset markets (Financial Stability Review, May 2022)European Central Bank, financial stability review of May 2022